Apr 8, 2010
Raffles Hotel 'sold for $384m'
Qatar sovereign wealth fund will take 40% stake in current owner as part of deal: Paper
By Esther Teo
SINGAPORE'S iconic Raffles Hotel has been reportedly bought by a Qatar sovereign wealth fund for US$275 million (S$384 million).
Qatari Diar - the principal real estate entity of the Qatar Investment Authority - has purchased the historic property in Beach Road from current owner Fairmont Raffles, a Toronto-based luxury hotel chain, according to an Abu Dhabi newspaper, The National.
Fairmont Raffles has about 100 hotels under the three brands of Raffles, Fairmont and Swissotel in 24 countries. The Straits Times understands that the chain owns Raffles Hotel here.
In addition to assuming ownership of Raffles, the deal sees Qatari Diar injecting US$467 million into Fairmont Raffles in exchange for a 40 per cent stake in the hotel chain. The US$275 million from the sale of Raffles Hotel, and a gain of US$105 million in promised management contracts, bring the overall deal to US$847 million.
As the deal involves Fairmont Raffles issuing new shares, Saudi Arabia's Kingdom Holding, an investment company controlled by Saudi billionaire prince Alwaleed Talal, will see its stake in the hotel group diluted to 35 per cent from its original 58 per cent. This makes it the second-largest shareholder of the company.
In 2006, Prince Alwaleed teamed up with United States-based Colony Capital to buy Fairmont Hotels and Resorts' chain of hotels in 24 countries for US$3.9 billion. The latest change in shareholding at Fairmont Raffles will result in Colony Capital's stake being reduced to 22 per cent, with the Ontario Municipal Employee Retirement System also owning an interest, Bloomberg reported.
Mr William Fatt, chief executive of Fairmont Raffles, told Reuters that all of the sale proceeds would go to Fairmont and be used to fund its expansion plans, including those in China and Saudi Arabia.
Fairmont Raffles does not own either Swissotel The Stamford or Fairmont Singapore.
Both hotels are within Raffles City Singapore, which is 60 per cent owned by CapitaCommercial Trust and 40 per cent owned by CapitaMall Trust, a spokesman said.
'CapitaCommercial Trust and CapitaMall Trust have no intention to sell their respective stakes in, or any part of, Raffles City Singapore,' the spokesman added.
esthert@sph.com.sg
In addition to taking over Raffles Hotel, Qatari Diar will inject US$467 million into Fairmont Raffles in exchange for a 40 per cent stake in the luxury hotel chain. -- ST FILE PHOTO
Friday, April 9, 2010
ST : Drop in prime retail rents levelling off
Apr 8, 2010
Drop in prime retail rents levelling off
Report: Smaller dip due to economic recovery, active leasing market
By Esther Teo
THE decline in prime retail rents looks set to bottom out as the economic recovery gathers pace and consumer confidence rebounds, says a new report.
In its latest analysis of Singapore's prime retail scene released yesterday, CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) found that the pace of prime Orchard Road rental decline slowed significantly in the first quarter of this year to an average rent of $32.20 per sq ft (psf), down just 0.7 per cent from the previous quarter's figure.
The dip is markedly smaller than in the previous four quarters, which saw falls of between 1.5 per cent and 3.3 per cent, CBRE said.
CBRE director of retail services Letty Lee said: 'The Orchard Road retail scene has evolved in the last 12 months...The slowdown in the rental decline is a sign that Orchard Road shops are holding up fairly well at this stage in the recovery.'
The firming market is believed to be partly due to an active retail leasing market during the last quarter.
Youth-themed mall *Scape in Somerset Road has announced an 80 per cent pre-commitment ahead of its June opening, and the basement link from Raffles City to Esplanade due to open in July is said to be more than 63 per cent pre-let.
Ms Lee said a range of factors come into play when determining rentals, including the extent of the global economic recovery and whether the integrated resorts (IRs) will generate enough buzz to increase tourist numbers and spending.
Last month, DTZ Research reported that, with tourist arrivals expected to grow and local consumption improving, demand for retail space was likely to rise.
Ms Chua Chor Hoon, DTZ's head of South-east Asia research, noted that retail rents had held firm during the quarter, despite new supply coming onstream last year and during the first quarter of this year. But the estimated 2.3 million sq ft of new retail space for this year is 15 per cent down on the 2.7 million sq ft of new supply released onto the market last year, she said.
Ms Chua predicted prime retail rents will rise moderately this year. 'Demand for retail space is more supply-led. Brands will want to increase their footprint to improve revenue as more space comes up. Many new brands and F&B concepts are entering the Singapore market as well, which will absorb this supply.'
Increases in rent for food and beverage (F&B) spaces have already been seen, with increasing demand from newer concepts such as all-day breakfast outlets, 24-hour grocers and gourmet markets, CBRE's Ms Lee said.
She anticipates an interesting year ahead with the opening of the two IRs and the second phase of the Circle Line from Bartley to Dhoby Ghaut, which will 'effectively facilitate islandwide mobility and redistribute shopper traffic'.
'Expectations are up and we look forward to an even wider array of shops and retail experiences with the entry of more new-to-market labels and international brands - many of which are looking at Singapore as a springboard into the Asian market,' Ms Lee said.
Suburban rents for prime space had remained stable, said DTZ and CBRE, citing average rates of $33.50 psf and $28.10 psf respectively, unchanged from the previous quarter's figures.
esthert@sph.com.sg
The slowdown in rental decline is a sign that Orchard Road shops are holding up fairly well at this stage in the economic recovery, says CBRE director of retail services Letty Lee. -- ST FILE PHOTO
Drop in prime retail rents levelling off
Report: Smaller dip due to economic recovery, active leasing market
By Esther Teo
THE decline in prime retail rents looks set to bottom out as the economic recovery gathers pace and consumer confidence rebounds, says a new report.
In its latest analysis of Singapore's prime retail scene released yesterday, CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) found that the pace of prime Orchard Road rental decline slowed significantly in the first quarter of this year to an average rent of $32.20 per sq ft (psf), down just 0.7 per cent from the previous quarter's figure.
The dip is markedly smaller than in the previous four quarters, which saw falls of between 1.5 per cent and 3.3 per cent, CBRE said.
CBRE director of retail services Letty Lee said: 'The Orchard Road retail scene has evolved in the last 12 months...The slowdown in the rental decline is a sign that Orchard Road shops are holding up fairly well at this stage in the recovery.'
The firming market is believed to be partly due to an active retail leasing market during the last quarter.
Youth-themed mall *Scape in Somerset Road has announced an 80 per cent pre-commitment ahead of its June opening, and the basement link from Raffles City to Esplanade due to open in July is said to be more than 63 per cent pre-let.
Ms Lee said a range of factors come into play when determining rentals, including the extent of the global economic recovery and whether the integrated resorts (IRs) will generate enough buzz to increase tourist numbers and spending.
Last month, DTZ Research reported that, with tourist arrivals expected to grow and local consumption improving, demand for retail space was likely to rise.
Ms Chua Chor Hoon, DTZ's head of South-east Asia research, noted that retail rents had held firm during the quarter, despite new supply coming onstream last year and during the first quarter of this year. But the estimated 2.3 million sq ft of new retail space for this year is 15 per cent down on the 2.7 million sq ft of new supply released onto the market last year, she said.
Ms Chua predicted prime retail rents will rise moderately this year. 'Demand for retail space is more supply-led. Brands will want to increase their footprint to improve revenue as more space comes up. Many new brands and F&B concepts are entering the Singapore market as well, which will absorb this supply.'
Increases in rent for food and beverage (F&B) spaces have already been seen, with increasing demand from newer concepts such as all-day breakfast outlets, 24-hour grocers and gourmet markets, CBRE's Ms Lee said.
She anticipates an interesting year ahead with the opening of the two IRs and the second phase of the Circle Line from Bartley to Dhoby Ghaut, which will 'effectively facilitate islandwide mobility and redistribute shopper traffic'.
'Expectations are up and we look forward to an even wider array of shops and retail experiences with the entry of more new-to-market labels and international brands - many of which are looking at Singapore as a springboard into the Asian market,' Ms Lee said.
Suburban rents for prime space had remained stable, said DTZ and CBRE, citing average rates of $33.50 psf and $28.10 psf respectively, unchanged from the previous quarter's figures.
esthert@sph.com.sg
The slowdown in rental decline is a sign that Orchard Road shops are holding up fairly well at this stage in the economic recovery, says CBRE director of retail services Letty Lee. -- ST FILE PHOTO
ST : Toh Tuck Apartment site up for sale
Apr 8, 2010
Toh Tuck Apartment site up for sale
By Joyce Teo
A FREEHOLD residential redevelopment site in the Bukit Timah area, with an expected price tag of $35.5 million, has been put up for sale.
The 26-year-old Toh Tuck Apartment, formerly known as Toh Tuck Garden, currently sits on the 40,449 sq ft site, which has a plot ratio of 1.4, allowing it to be rebuilt to five storeys.
Marketer HSR said the seller's expected price of $35.5 million works out to $650 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr), inclusive of an estimated development charge of $5 million.
The site is owned by Aik Hwa Trading, formerly a small-time developer but now in the building materials business.
Because the plot is owned by one party, the sale is likely to go through quicker than a typical collective sale lacking 100 per cent owner approval.
Mr Jeffrey Goh, head of investment sales for HSR, said that given the additional 10 per cent gross floor area for balconies, the site could be redeveloped into 75 apartments with sizes ranging from 590 sq ft to 1,660 sq ft.
He estimated that a new development on the site could command a price of at least $1,200 psf. Already, developers have indicated interest and asked for more information, he said.
Property experts report that developers are hungry for land, but at present find some asking prices in the private collective sale market too high.
Toh Tuck Apartment is near developments such as Kismis View, The Beverly and Green Lodge.
Green Lodge was put up for collective sale late last year, but its tender closed earlier this year without attracting any firm bids.
Owners there were asking for $135 million, or $683 psf ppr, including a development charge. Their collective sale agreement has since lapsed.
The tender for Toh Tuck Apartment closes on April 23.
Toh Tuck Apartment site up for sale
By Joyce Teo
A FREEHOLD residential redevelopment site in the Bukit Timah area, with an expected price tag of $35.5 million, has been put up for sale.
The 26-year-old Toh Tuck Apartment, formerly known as Toh Tuck Garden, currently sits on the 40,449 sq ft site, which has a plot ratio of 1.4, allowing it to be rebuilt to five storeys.
Marketer HSR said the seller's expected price of $35.5 million works out to $650 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr), inclusive of an estimated development charge of $5 million.
The site is owned by Aik Hwa Trading, formerly a small-time developer but now in the building materials business.
Because the plot is owned by one party, the sale is likely to go through quicker than a typical collective sale lacking 100 per cent owner approval.
Mr Jeffrey Goh, head of investment sales for HSR, said that given the additional 10 per cent gross floor area for balconies, the site could be redeveloped into 75 apartments with sizes ranging from 590 sq ft to 1,660 sq ft.
He estimated that a new development on the site could command a price of at least $1,200 psf. Already, developers have indicated interest and asked for more information, he said.
Property experts report that developers are hungry for land, but at present find some asking prices in the private collective sale market too high.
Toh Tuck Apartment is near developments such as Kismis View, The Beverly and Green Lodge.
Green Lodge was put up for collective sale late last year, but its tender closed earlier this year without attracting any firm bids.
Owners there were asking for $135 million, or $683 psf ppr, including a development charge. Their collective sale agreement has since lapsed.
The tender for Toh Tuck Apartment closes on April 23.
ST : $110m bid committed, so Hougang site up for tender
Apr 8, 2010
$110m bid committed, so Hougang site up for tender
A SITE in Hougang Avenue 2 has been triggered for tender after an unnamed developer committed to a minimum bid of $109.9 million.
The 3.02ha plot is slated for development into apartment blocks of up to five storeys in height, or landed homes of up to three storeys, and is located adjacent to Hougang HDB town.
Surrounded by mostly landed homes, it has a 99-year lease and a maximum gross floor area of 455,152 sq ft.
CBRE Research executive director Li Hiaw Ho said the site is likely to fetch a land price of $140 million to $160 million, or between $310 and $350 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr), if a low-rise condominium of around 400 units is built.
For about the same land price, around 200 cluster houses could be considered for a strata landed housing project, he added.
Ngee Ann Polytechnic real estate lecturer Nicholas Mak said the site could attract six to 11 bids, with the top two or three bids likely coming in at between $180 million and $200 million, or $395 to $440 psf ppr.
Recent launches in the vicinity include the 81-unit Residences Botanique and the 33-unit Wembley Residences, which over the past six months have fetched average prices of around $990 psf and $850 psf respectively.
The terrace and semi-detached houses in the neighbourhood's new freehold cluster projects - including Jansen 8 (10 units), Water Villas (15 units) and Verdana Villas (36 units) - were sold at between $1.8 million and $3 million, according to CBRE.
A residential site in Sengkang West Avenue was sold via the reserve list in February.
And two more sites - in Upper Changi Road North/Flora Drive and Tampines Road - as well as one executive condominium site at the junction of Sengkang East Avenue and Buangkok Drive have been triggered.
$110m bid committed, so Hougang site up for tender
A SITE in Hougang Avenue 2 has been triggered for tender after an unnamed developer committed to a minimum bid of $109.9 million.
The 3.02ha plot is slated for development into apartment blocks of up to five storeys in height, or landed homes of up to three storeys, and is located adjacent to Hougang HDB town.
Surrounded by mostly landed homes, it has a 99-year lease and a maximum gross floor area of 455,152 sq ft.
CBRE Research executive director Li Hiaw Ho said the site is likely to fetch a land price of $140 million to $160 million, or between $310 and $350 per sq ft (psf) per plot ratio (ppr), if a low-rise condominium of around 400 units is built.
For about the same land price, around 200 cluster houses could be considered for a strata landed housing project, he added.
Ngee Ann Polytechnic real estate lecturer Nicholas Mak said the site could attract six to 11 bids, with the top two or three bids likely coming in at between $180 million and $200 million, or $395 to $440 psf ppr.
Recent launches in the vicinity include the 81-unit Residences Botanique and the 33-unit Wembley Residences, which over the past six months have fetched average prices of around $990 psf and $850 psf respectively.
The terrace and semi-detached houses in the neighbourhood's new freehold cluster projects - including Jansen 8 (10 units), Water Villas (15 units) and Verdana Villas (36 units) - were sold at between $1.8 million and $3 million, according to CBRE.
A residential site in Sengkang West Avenue was sold via the reserve list in February.
And two more sites - in Upper Changi Road North/Flora Drive and Tampines Road - as well as one executive condominium site at the junction of Sengkang East Avenue and Buangkok Drive have been triggered.
ST : Now to grow old in some (optional) style
Apr 7, 2010
Now to grow old in some (optional) style
THE notion of retirement living in Singapore is shaped to an extent by the Government's active promoting of community sharing and family togetherness. Thus are custom-fitted studio apartment blocks for elderly people located in a town's commercial hub, for ease of daily living. In support of the family, the offer of grant incentives has been a powerful lure to have grown children live close to their aged parents in HDB estates. It is meant to solidify relationships. Working couples check in on their elders, the elderly folk help with the child-minding where they can - a neat fit all round. On the periphery are modest retirement homes that cater to the elderly sick and the very old, usually without family. Not being commercial- scale operations, these homes have remained a niche service through the years, although they are greatly appreciated by the community.
But with the first cohorts among post-war baby boomers about to ease off on a life of striving, the coming wave of retirees will want a choice of retirement accommodation. Many will have ample disposable income. They should be permitted that choice, within the limits of sensible public policy. The trend, explored by our reporter Radha Basu in The Sunday Times this week, will gain momentum as so-called active-ageing retirees with varied interests and the means with which to indulge them begin to influence business investments catering to their demographic segment. Even government policy could hardly stay constant, for example on discretionary land use for the building of retirement villages.
This business possibility received a renewed airing at the Ageing Asia business forum this week. Well-appointed retirement villages offering every imaginable service - nursing and rehabilitative care, recreation and excursions, libraries, optional catering - will be land-intensive. This fact alone will militate against the concept gaining wide application. A government offer of a piece of land in Upper Bukit Timah for such a construction was in fact not taken up. A developer thought the short lease of 30 years did not make for a viable business. That trial phase can be considered over. As demand for more gracious retirement living can be expected to grow in the coming decades, new thinking should emerge. Developers, insurance and health-care companies could offer ideas to the Government on land use that would be pitched at meeting a social need and not necessarily be regarded as wasteful. These villages will, however, be a small part of retirement management. It is as well to remember that. It would be unpleasant to have the elitist label flung at village people who just wish to live well, but this is a probability to consider.
Now to grow old in some (optional) style
THE notion of retirement living in Singapore is shaped to an extent by the Government's active promoting of community sharing and family togetherness. Thus are custom-fitted studio apartment blocks for elderly people located in a town's commercial hub, for ease of daily living. In support of the family, the offer of grant incentives has been a powerful lure to have grown children live close to their aged parents in HDB estates. It is meant to solidify relationships. Working couples check in on their elders, the elderly folk help with the child-minding where they can - a neat fit all round. On the periphery are modest retirement homes that cater to the elderly sick and the very old, usually without family. Not being commercial- scale operations, these homes have remained a niche service through the years, although they are greatly appreciated by the community.
But with the first cohorts among post-war baby boomers about to ease off on a life of striving, the coming wave of retirees will want a choice of retirement accommodation. Many will have ample disposable income. They should be permitted that choice, within the limits of sensible public policy. The trend, explored by our reporter Radha Basu in The Sunday Times this week, will gain momentum as so-called active-ageing retirees with varied interests and the means with which to indulge them begin to influence business investments catering to their demographic segment. Even government policy could hardly stay constant, for example on discretionary land use for the building of retirement villages.
This business possibility received a renewed airing at the Ageing Asia business forum this week. Well-appointed retirement villages offering every imaginable service - nursing and rehabilitative care, recreation and excursions, libraries, optional catering - will be land-intensive. This fact alone will militate against the concept gaining wide application. A government offer of a piece of land in Upper Bukit Timah for such a construction was in fact not taken up. A developer thought the short lease of 30 years did not make for a viable business. That trial phase can be considered over. As demand for more gracious retirement living can be expected to grow in the coming decades, new thinking should emerge. Developers, insurance and health-care companies could offer ideas to the Government on land use that would be pitched at meeting a social need and not necessarily be regarded as wasteful. These villages will, however, be a small part of retirement management. It is as well to remember that. It would be unpleasant to have the elitist label flung at village people who just wish to live well, but this is a probability to consider.
TODAY ONLINE : It's getting hot in Hougang
It's getting hot in Hougang
$110m bid for Hougang Ave 2 site triggers a second tender in just two weeks
05:55 AM Apr 08, 2010
by Millet Enriquez
SINGAPORE - The recent triggering of Government Reserve List land sites in Hougang may have been sheer coincidence, but analysts believe developers have a keen interest in the area because they are expecting an influx of home upgraders.
"The HDB estates in Hougang and Punggol have a population of about 230,000, which represents a very significant pool of private residential property buyers," said Mr Nicholas Mak, real estate lecturer at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.
Following yesterday's launch of the Hougang S13 site by the Housing and Development Board, another site in Hougang Avenue 2 will be put up for tender by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) in the next two weeks. Both are from the Government's Reserve List.
In all, three residential sites in Hougang and Buangkok that were on the Reserve List have been triggered this year. Apart from the Hougang sites, an executive condominium site at Buangkok Drive has been triggered and is pending a tender launch.
One reason for the larger number of launches in the area is that a higher proportion of the sites included in the Government's Land Sales Programme for the first half of this year are located in the north-east of Singapore, said Mr Mak.
The Hougang S13 land parcel, first included in the Reserve List in July 2001, was triggered after a developer last month committed a $6.5-million minimum bid.
The latest site at Hougang Avenue 2 was put on the Reserve List on Feb 25 and a developer has since committed a bid of $109.9 million, the URA announced yesterday. Mr Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International said it is likely competition for the site would be intense, given that the last landed sales in December attracted a record 32 bidders.
Mr Li Hiaw Ho, executive director at CBRE Research, estimated the site would yield either 400 units for low-rise condo development or about 200 units of cluster housing. He said the bid price could be between $140 million and $160 million.
$110m bid for Hougang Ave 2 site triggers a second tender in just two weeks
05:55 AM Apr 08, 2010
by Millet Enriquez
SINGAPORE - The recent triggering of Government Reserve List land sites in Hougang may have been sheer coincidence, but analysts believe developers have a keen interest in the area because they are expecting an influx of home upgraders.
"The HDB estates in Hougang and Punggol have a population of about 230,000, which represents a very significant pool of private residential property buyers," said Mr Nicholas Mak, real estate lecturer at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.
Following yesterday's launch of the Hougang S13 site by the Housing and Development Board, another site in Hougang Avenue 2 will be put up for tender by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) in the next two weeks. Both are from the Government's Reserve List.
In all, three residential sites in Hougang and Buangkok that were on the Reserve List have been triggered this year. Apart from the Hougang sites, an executive condominium site at Buangkok Drive has been triggered and is pending a tender launch.
One reason for the larger number of launches in the area is that a higher proportion of the sites included in the Government's Land Sales Programme for the first half of this year are located in the north-east of Singapore, said Mr Mak.
The Hougang S13 land parcel, first included in the Reserve List in July 2001, was triggered after a developer last month committed a $6.5-million minimum bid.
The latest site at Hougang Avenue 2 was put on the Reserve List on Feb 25 and a developer has since committed a bid of $109.9 million, the URA announced yesterday. Mr Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International said it is likely competition for the site would be intense, given that the last landed sales in December attracted a record 32 bidders.
Mr Li Hiaw Ho, executive director at CBRE Research, estimated the site would yield either 400 units for low-rise condo development or about 200 units of cluster housing. He said the bid price could be between $140 million and $160 million.
TODAY ONLINE : Another condo rushes to go en bloc, but is this a bad time?
Another condo rushes to go en bloc, but is this a bad time?
05:55 AM Apr 08, 2010
SINGAPORE - Another group of homeowners is hoping to cash in on the red-hot property market by launching an en bloc sale.
Toh Tuck Apartment, off Upper Bukit Timah Road, has been put up for sale by tender. The freehold residential site comprises 13 apartments of roughly the same size, each averaging 223 square metres.
At the asking price of $35.5 million, each owner is expected to get an average of about $2.73 million for their unit. This translates to a plot ratio of $650 per square foot.
Property analysts say that developers may be less likely to go for collective sales, given the market's bullishness.
Mr Donald Han, managing director of Cushman and Wakefield Singapore, reckons developers will prefer buying Government land since the process will be quicker.
This is because developers do not want to land themselves in a situation where the en bloc sale is long drawn out and risk getting caught in a possible market correction.
Marketing agent HSR says the final amount each owner will receive depends on the transacted price.
The 40,449-square-foot site has a permissible plot ratio of 1.4 and can be built up to five storeys.
HSR International says the site can be redeveloped into 75 apartment units.
It said the site has achieved 100-per-cent consensus from the owners. Tender for the sale closes on April 23. Julie Quek
05:55 AM Apr 08, 2010
SINGAPORE - Another group of homeowners is hoping to cash in on the red-hot property market by launching an en bloc sale.
Toh Tuck Apartment, off Upper Bukit Timah Road, has been put up for sale by tender. The freehold residential site comprises 13 apartments of roughly the same size, each averaging 223 square metres.
At the asking price of $35.5 million, each owner is expected to get an average of about $2.73 million for their unit. This translates to a plot ratio of $650 per square foot.
Property analysts say that developers may be less likely to go for collective sales, given the market's bullishness.
Mr Donald Han, managing director of Cushman and Wakefield Singapore, reckons developers will prefer buying Government land since the process will be quicker.
This is because developers do not want to land themselves in a situation where the en bloc sale is long drawn out and risk getting caught in a possible market correction.
Marketing agent HSR says the final amount each owner will receive depends on the transacted price.
The 40,449-square-foot site has a permissible plot ratio of 1.4 and can be built up to five storeys.
HSR International says the site can be redeveloped into 75 apartment units.
It said the site has achieved 100-per-cent consensus from the owners. Tender for the sale closes on April 23. Julie Quek
BT : Historic Raffles Hotel set to switch hands
Business Times - 08 Apr 2010
Historic Raffles Hotel set to switch hands
This would be part of deal that sees Qatar fund buy 40% of Fairmont Raffles
By UMA SHANKARI
(SINGAPORE) Sources say the Raffles Hotel is likely to change hands - for the third time in seven years - after shareholding changes at current owner Fairmont Raffles.
Toronto-based luxury hotel chain Fairmont Raffles said on Monday that Qatar's sovereign wealth fund Qatari Diar has acquired a 40 per cent stake in the group, in a US$847 million deal that will also see it take ownership of one of the chain's Singaporean hotels.
Fairmont Raffles declined to name the hotel but said it has three hotels in Singapore: Raffles Hotel, Fairmont Singapore and Swissôtel The Stamford.
The unlisted hotelier will get US$275 million from the sale of the Singapore hotel the Qatari investors have agreed to buy by early 2011.
Market sources here identified Raffles Hotel as the property that will probably be signed over. Swissôtel The Stamford and Fairmont Singapore are part of Raffles City Singapore, which is owned by two units of Singapore's CapitaLand.
'We wish to affirm that the Raffles City Singapore development is owned by CapitaCommercial Trust (60 per cent) and CapitaMall Trust (40 per cent),' the two Reits said in letter to BT yesterday. 'CapitaCommercial Trust (CCT) and CapitaMall Trust (CMT) have no intention of selling their respective stakes in, or any part of, Raffles City Singapore.'
Swissôtel The Stamford and Fairmont Singapore are only operated by RC Hotels, a tenant at Raffles City, CCT and CMT clarified. RC Hotels' long-term lease with Raffles City expires in November 2016, although there is an option to renew the lease for a further term expiring in December 2036.
Asked if there was a change in the tenant's owner, CCT and CMT said discussions with tenants are confidential.
This leaves Raffles Hotel, which is more than 120 years old and gazetted as a national monument.
The hotel, built in 1887 on the site of a 10-room bungalow, has gained worldwide fame and is mentioned in the works by writers Somerset Maugham and Joseph Conrad.
The hotel was part of Singapore-listed Raffles Holdings' portfolio until 2005, when the now de-listed company sold all of its hotel assets to US-based Colony Capital for $1.7 billion.
In 2006, Colony Capital teamed up with Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal to buy Fairmont Hotels and Resorts in a US$3.9 billion deal that injected Raffles Hotel into Fairmont Raffles's portfolio.
Now, with Fairmont Raffles's decision to take on Qatari Diar as its newest and largest shareholder, the hotel is set to be transferred to the Qatar-based real estate firm next year.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Likely to change hands for the third time in seven years: Raffles Hotel is more than 120 years old and is gazetted as a national monument
Historic Raffles Hotel set to switch hands
This would be part of deal that sees Qatar fund buy 40% of Fairmont Raffles
By UMA SHANKARI
(SINGAPORE) Sources say the Raffles Hotel is likely to change hands - for the third time in seven years - after shareholding changes at current owner Fairmont Raffles.
Toronto-based luxury hotel chain Fairmont Raffles said on Monday that Qatar's sovereign wealth fund Qatari Diar has acquired a 40 per cent stake in the group, in a US$847 million deal that will also see it take ownership of one of the chain's Singaporean hotels.
Fairmont Raffles declined to name the hotel but said it has three hotels in Singapore: Raffles Hotel, Fairmont Singapore and Swissôtel The Stamford.
The unlisted hotelier will get US$275 million from the sale of the Singapore hotel the Qatari investors have agreed to buy by early 2011.
Market sources here identified Raffles Hotel as the property that will probably be signed over. Swissôtel The Stamford and Fairmont Singapore are part of Raffles City Singapore, which is owned by two units of Singapore's CapitaLand.
'We wish to affirm that the Raffles City Singapore development is owned by CapitaCommercial Trust (60 per cent) and CapitaMall Trust (40 per cent),' the two Reits said in letter to BT yesterday. 'CapitaCommercial Trust (CCT) and CapitaMall Trust (CMT) have no intention of selling their respective stakes in, or any part of, Raffles City Singapore.'
Swissôtel The Stamford and Fairmont Singapore are only operated by RC Hotels, a tenant at Raffles City, CCT and CMT clarified. RC Hotels' long-term lease with Raffles City expires in November 2016, although there is an option to renew the lease for a further term expiring in December 2036.
Asked if there was a change in the tenant's owner, CCT and CMT said discussions with tenants are confidential.
This leaves Raffles Hotel, which is more than 120 years old and gazetted as a national monument.
The hotel, built in 1887 on the site of a 10-room bungalow, has gained worldwide fame and is mentioned in the works by writers Somerset Maugham and Joseph Conrad.
The hotel was part of Singapore-listed Raffles Holdings' portfolio until 2005, when the now de-listed company sold all of its hotel assets to US-based Colony Capital for $1.7 billion.
In 2006, Colony Capital teamed up with Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal to buy Fairmont Hotels and Resorts in a US$3.9 billion deal that injected Raffles Hotel into Fairmont Raffles's portfolio.
Now, with Fairmont Raffles's decision to take on Qatari Diar as its newest and largest shareholder, the hotel is set to be transferred to the Qatar-based real estate firm next year.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Likely to change hands for the third time in seven years: Raffles Hotel is more than 120 years old and is gazetted as a national monument
BT : Space at MBFC Tower2 almost fully taken
Business Times - 08 Apr 2010
Space at MBFC Tower2 almost fully taken
A small percentage of space is reserved for existing tenants' expansion
By EMILYN YAP
MARINA Bay Financial Centre (MBFC) Tower 2 is close to being fully leased, after a new tenant came on board and an existing one took on more space.
Prudential Asset Management (Singapore) will be leasing one and a half floors at the building, which works out to around 37,000 square feet of space. It will move in next year on a nine-year lease.
Meanwhile, Barclays Capital, which already signed a lease at MBFC Tower 2, has asked for more space.
It committed to rent four floors at the building, or around 100,000 sq ft of space, in April 2008. It has more than tripled its commitment to 14 floors or around 350,000 sq ft of space. This confirms a BT report early last month.
Barclays Capital will move to MBFC Tower 2 in Q1 2011 and its lease lasts 10 years. It now has offices at One Raffles Quay (ORQ) and it will retain its space there.
Both ORQ and MBFC are managed by Raffles Quay Asset Management. Barclays Capital director Quek Suan Kiat said: 'Our existing relationship with the landlord, and the proximity of MBFC Tower 2 to our current office space at ORQ, were key factors in our choice of location.'
Raffles Quay Asset Management said yesterday that MBFC Tower 2 is fully leased 'except for a small percentage of space reserved for existing tenants' expansion'.
It declined to say how much space it is setting aside, and which tenants could take on more space. Other tenants at MBFC Tower 2 include BHP Billiton, Macquarie and Nomura.
'Monthly rents at MBFC are in line with the current market rates,' Raffles Quay Asset Management told BT. According to a CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) report last week, Grade A office rents averaged $8 per square foot (psf) per month in Q1 2010, down slightly from $8.10 psf per month a quarter ago.
CBRE office services executive director Moray Armstrong said in the report: 'As we emerged from the recent recession, occupiers that had necessarily held off decisions on premises started to gear up to take advantage of competitive rents.'
The consultancy was involved in getting Nomura, Barclays Capital and Prudential Asset Management to secure space at MBFC.
MBFC Tower 2 will receive Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) in Q3. Nearby, Marina Bay Residences and Marina Bay Link Mall will obtain TOP in the next two weeks and in Q3 respectively.
The mall is likely to open its doors in Q4 after the area sees more office workers and residents.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Competitive: Monthly rents at MBFC are in line with the current market rates, says its manager
Space at MBFC Tower2 almost fully taken
A small percentage of space is reserved for existing tenants' expansion
By EMILYN YAP
MARINA Bay Financial Centre (MBFC) Tower 2 is close to being fully leased, after a new tenant came on board and an existing one took on more space.
Prudential Asset Management (Singapore) will be leasing one and a half floors at the building, which works out to around 37,000 square feet of space. It will move in next year on a nine-year lease.
Meanwhile, Barclays Capital, which already signed a lease at MBFC Tower 2, has asked for more space.
It committed to rent four floors at the building, or around 100,000 sq ft of space, in April 2008. It has more than tripled its commitment to 14 floors or around 350,000 sq ft of space. This confirms a BT report early last month.
Barclays Capital will move to MBFC Tower 2 in Q1 2011 and its lease lasts 10 years. It now has offices at One Raffles Quay (ORQ) and it will retain its space there.
Both ORQ and MBFC are managed by Raffles Quay Asset Management. Barclays Capital director Quek Suan Kiat said: 'Our existing relationship with the landlord, and the proximity of MBFC Tower 2 to our current office space at ORQ, were key factors in our choice of location.'
Raffles Quay Asset Management said yesterday that MBFC Tower 2 is fully leased 'except for a small percentage of space reserved for existing tenants' expansion'.
It declined to say how much space it is setting aside, and which tenants could take on more space. Other tenants at MBFC Tower 2 include BHP Billiton, Macquarie and Nomura.
'Monthly rents at MBFC are in line with the current market rates,' Raffles Quay Asset Management told BT. According to a CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) report last week, Grade A office rents averaged $8 per square foot (psf) per month in Q1 2010, down slightly from $8.10 psf per month a quarter ago.
CBRE office services executive director Moray Armstrong said in the report: 'As we emerged from the recent recession, occupiers that had necessarily held off decisions on premises started to gear up to take advantage of competitive rents.'
The consultancy was involved in getting Nomura, Barclays Capital and Prudential Asset Management to secure space at MBFC.
MBFC Tower 2 will receive Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) in Q3. Nearby, Marina Bay Residences and Marina Bay Link Mall will obtain TOP in the next two weeks and in Q3 respectively.
The mall is likely to open its doors in Q4 after the area sees more office workers and residents.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Competitive: Monthly rents at MBFC are in line with the current market rates, says its manager
BT : URA to launch residential site in Hougang
Business Times - 08 Apr 2010
URA to launch residential site in Hougang
Tender for the plot on the reserve list of the H12010 GLS programme will be launched in 2 weeks
By UMA SHANKARI
THE Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has accepted an application from a developer to tender a residential site at Hougang Avenue 2.
The 99-year-leasehold plot is on the reserve list of the first-half 2010 government land sales (GLS) programme.
The tender will be launched in two weeks.
URA said yesterday it has received a minimum bid of $109.9 million for the 3.02ha site from an unnamed developer.
This works out to $241 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr).
The site, which has a maximum gross floor area of 455,152 sq ft, is slated for a low-density condominium, flats or landed housing.
Analysts say that assuming that a low-rise condominium of around 400 units is be built, the top bid could be $310-$350 psf ppr.
This works out to $141-$159 million for the site.
Alternatively, around the same land price about 200 cluster housing units can be considered.
CB Richard Ellis said recent launches in the area include the 81-unit Residences Botanique and the 33-unit Wembley Residences, where homes sold on average for $990 psf and $850 psf respectively in the past six months.
Freehold terrace and semi-detached houses in new cluster projects in the neighbourhood, such as Jansen 8, Water Villas and Verdana Villas, were sold at $1.8 million to $3 million.
URA said yesterday that another 13 sites on the reserve list of the first-half 2010 GLS programme can be triggered for sale - including two executive condominium sites and two mixed-use sites where 5,885 private residential units can potentially be built.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
URA to launch residential site in Hougang
Tender for the plot on the reserve list of the H12010 GLS programme will be launched in 2 weeks
By UMA SHANKARI
THE Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has accepted an application from a developer to tender a residential site at Hougang Avenue 2.
The 99-year-leasehold plot is on the reserve list of the first-half 2010 government land sales (GLS) programme.
The tender will be launched in two weeks.
URA said yesterday it has received a minimum bid of $109.9 million for the 3.02ha site from an unnamed developer.
This works out to $241 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr).
The site, which has a maximum gross floor area of 455,152 sq ft, is slated for a low-density condominium, flats or landed housing.
Analysts say that assuming that a low-rise condominium of around 400 units is be built, the top bid could be $310-$350 psf ppr.
This works out to $141-$159 million for the site.
Alternatively, around the same land price about 200 cluster housing units can be considered.
CB Richard Ellis said recent launches in the area include the 81-unit Residences Botanique and the 33-unit Wembley Residences, where homes sold on average for $990 psf and $850 psf respectively in the past six months.
Freehold terrace and semi-detached houses in new cluster projects in the neighbourhood, such as Jansen 8, Water Villas and Verdana Villas, were sold at $1.8 million to $3 million.
URA said yesterday that another 13 sites on the reserve list of the first-half 2010 GLS programme can be triggered for sale - including two executive condominium sites and two mixed-use sites where 5,885 private residential units can potentially be built.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
BT : HDB clarifies stand on wet market rent hike
Business Times - 08 Apr 2010
HDB clarifies stand on wet market rent hike
IN the light of concerns about the recent rent hike at five of Sheng Siong Properties' wet markets, the Housing & Development Board (HDB) has clarified its position on the issue.
HDB says the five wet markets in question were purchased by Sheng Siong from Heeton Holdings on Jan 4. In approving the sale, HDB says it specified that the properties must continue to be operated as wet markets and made clear that any change of use has to be subjected to its approval.
HDB says it has informed Sheng Siong that these properties will remain as wet markets as there is still demand from the residents for these facilities. It also said it will not allow conversion of any of these properties to other uses, even if all the stalls are vacated.
HDB says it recognises Sheng Siong's prerogative to adjust the rent and the tenancy terms for the stallholders. Nonetheless, it advised Sheng Siong that they will face much difficulty attracting stallholders if they charge excessive rent.
Likewise, it said, the stallholders who are compelled to set high prices for their produce because of the high rent might not be able to sustain their business in the longer term.
HDB also suggested to Sheng Siong it should consider the wet markets' operation on a long-term sustainable basis when making any rental or tenancy adjustments. HDB assured the residents concerned that it will ensure their marketing needs are met.
HDB clarifies stand on wet market rent hike
IN the light of concerns about the recent rent hike at five of Sheng Siong Properties' wet markets, the Housing & Development Board (HDB) has clarified its position on the issue.
HDB says the five wet markets in question were purchased by Sheng Siong from Heeton Holdings on Jan 4. In approving the sale, HDB says it specified that the properties must continue to be operated as wet markets and made clear that any change of use has to be subjected to its approval.
HDB says it has informed Sheng Siong that these properties will remain as wet markets as there is still demand from the residents for these facilities. It also said it will not allow conversion of any of these properties to other uses, even if all the stalls are vacated.
HDB says it recognises Sheng Siong's prerogative to adjust the rent and the tenancy terms for the stallholders. Nonetheless, it advised Sheng Siong that they will face much difficulty attracting stallholders if they charge excessive rent.
Likewise, it said, the stallholders who are compelled to set high prices for their produce because of the high rent might not be able to sustain their business in the longer term.
HDB also suggested to Sheng Siong it should consider the wet markets' operation on a long-term sustainable basis when making any rental or tenancy adjustments. HDB assured the residents concerned that it will ensure their marketing needs are met.
ST : Industrial sector set for upturn
Apr 7, 2010
Industrial sector set for upturn
THE industrial market showed signs of improvement in the first quarter of the year, according to two new reports published today.
In its latest market analysis, CBRE points out that demand for factory and warehouse space here is steadily growing, despite rents showing no signs of rising yet.
In the second report, DTZ points out that the industrial sector has overtaken the residential segment as the dominant sector for investment deals, though it's thanks largely to one buyer.
In the first quarter of the year, the largest investment deal was the sale of the $323 million CWT Commodity Hub to Cache Logistics Trust, said CBRE.
In all, Cache made six sale-and-leaseback deals amounting to $713.2 million, helping to catapult first-quarter industrial investment sales to $1.02 billion, or 38.5 per cent of total transacted value, noted DTZ.
Residential investments amounted to $879.2 million, with the bulk coming from the sale of government sites.
Private residential investment sales accounted for just 6.3 per cent of total residential deals.
It reports that while investment by local firms continued to dominate due to purchases by local developers and real estate investment trusts (Reits), more foreign buyers could be on the way.
Also, Reit acquisitions are restarting, and more office buildings are expected to be transacted for redevelopment into residential use, it said.
Mr Bernard Goh, CBRE's director of industrial and logistics services, said: 'The (industrial) market appears to have turned around from the past year. We are seeing an improved demand for industrial space and a rise in rents can be expected towards the tail end of the year.'
Currently, factory and warehouse rents have not risen since the first quarter of 2008, when they first dipped in the current cycle, said CBRE.
For instance, in the first quarter of this year, average monthly rents for factory units held firm at $1.40 per sq ft (psf) for ground floor space, it said.
Meanwhile, an industrial site in Yishun Avenue 6 has attracted seven bids. OKH Holdings topped the tender with a bid of $27.2 million or $71 psf/plot ratio.
The bid is 8.3 per cent above the second bid from Soilbuild Group Holdings and more than twice the application bid.
CBRE estimates the breakeven cost for this development at between $250 psf and $270 psf.
It said the healthy interest could be due to the lack of industrial sites in Yishun. A more positive business sentiment could have also played a part in the robust response to the tender, it added.
Industrial sector set for upturn
THE industrial market showed signs of improvement in the first quarter of the year, according to two new reports published today.
In its latest market analysis, CBRE points out that demand for factory and warehouse space here is steadily growing, despite rents showing no signs of rising yet.
In the second report, DTZ points out that the industrial sector has overtaken the residential segment as the dominant sector for investment deals, though it's thanks largely to one buyer.
In the first quarter of the year, the largest investment deal was the sale of the $323 million CWT Commodity Hub to Cache Logistics Trust, said CBRE.
In all, Cache made six sale-and-leaseback deals amounting to $713.2 million, helping to catapult first-quarter industrial investment sales to $1.02 billion, or 38.5 per cent of total transacted value, noted DTZ.
Residential investments amounted to $879.2 million, with the bulk coming from the sale of government sites.
Private residential investment sales accounted for just 6.3 per cent of total residential deals.
It reports that while investment by local firms continued to dominate due to purchases by local developers and real estate investment trusts (Reits), more foreign buyers could be on the way.
Also, Reit acquisitions are restarting, and more office buildings are expected to be transacted for redevelopment into residential use, it said.
Mr Bernard Goh, CBRE's director of industrial and logistics services, said: 'The (industrial) market appears to have turned around from the past year. We are seeing an improved demand for industrial space and a rise in rents can be expected towards the tail end of the year.'
Currently, factory and warehouse rents have not risen since the first quarter of 2008, when they first dipped in the current cycle, said CBRE.
For instance, in the first quarter of this year, average monthly rents for factory units held firm at $1.40 per sq ft (psf) for ground floor space, it said.
Meanwhile, an industrial site in Yishun Avenue 6 has attracted seven bids. OKH Holdings topped the tender with a bid of $27.2 million or $71 psf/plot ratio.
The bid is 8.3 per cent above the second bid from Soilbuild Group Holdings and more than twice the application bid.
CBRE estimates the breakeven cost for this development at between $250 psf and $270 psf.
It said the healthy interest could be due to the lack of industrial sites in Yishun. A more positive business sentiment could have also played a part in the robust response to the tender, it added.
ST : Govt wants to curb home owners from cashing out early
Apr 7, 2010
Govt wants to curb home owners from cashing out early
THE Government is concerned about home owners cashing out from their flats prematurely and is considering ways to discourage them from doing so, said National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan.
The review comes amid concerns over a growing number of home owners who sell their Housing Board (HDB) flats to pay off debts or buy luxury items - and then return to the HDB to seek help with housing.
Mr Mah told The Straits Times on Monday: 'There are many different options that we have to look at, one of which is to see how we can transfer some of the subsidy that is given when the flat is purchased, whether we transfer it into his CPF for retirement or medical expenses or to buy another flat...to make sure they don't take it out as cash and spend it away.'
But, he added, if the proceeds from selling the flat are used to buy another property, 'there will not be an issue'.
'We are not concerned if they are substituting one house for another, it's only when they use it for all sorts of (other) things,' he said.
Last month, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong expressed concern over the trend of people selling their flats for a quick profit with little regard for future housing.
Some of these people have turned to Members of Parliament for help. Others have turned to the HDB or to relatives, while some have set up homes on beaches, he noted.
More recently, home owners desperate for cash are reported to have pledged flats to moneylenders as collateral for loans. Mr Mah said these cases were 'cause for concern'.
'So that's why we need to step up our education efforts, to emphasise that the HDB flat is not only a roof over their heads, but also a long-term investment.
'It's not for short-term profit or speculation,' he said.
He added that this is part of HDB's 'life cycle approach to housing' - where it subsidises flats and helps young couples get on the property ladder.
The HDB also arranges upgrading and ensures that flats maintain their value, and finally helps people monetise their flat when they retire, he said.
'But this works only if people do not cash out of their flats prematurely. If they were to sell their flats halfway through and use the money for various things, whether to start a business or to pay debts or spend on luxury items, then the whole concept doesn't work any more,' he said.
The Government is worried that more people are doing that and not making other arrangements for housing, he said.
Housing analysts The Straits Times spoke to say it is premature to predict what form new policies, if any, will take to tackle this challenge.
Associate Professor Sing Tien Foo of the National University of Singapore's real estate department said some proportion of profits from the sale of HDB flats could be locked into Central Provident Fund accounts, just as the CPF Investment Scheme requires profits made from the investments to be returned.
'But in our current hot property market, where significant gains can be made, locking up such monies may not be a popular idea,' he said.
But he agrees that any such policy would ensure the safety of retirement funds for home owners.
'If home owners cannot withdraw home sale profits, their consumption of other goods will likely have to be deferred, especially if they do not plan to buy another property,' he said.
Mr Mah said the Government has not decided what actions to take, but is looking at different measures.
'We have to find a way to make sure that this message of long-term investment is emphasised,' he said.
Govt wants to curb home owners from cashing out early
THE Government is concerned about home owners cashing out from their flats prematurely and is considering ways to discourage them from doing so, said National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan.
The review comes amid concerns over a growing number of home owners who sell their Housing Board (HDB) flats to pay off debts or buy luxury items - and then return to the HDB to seek help with housing.
Mr Mah told The Straits Times on Monday: 'There are many different options that we have to look at, one of which is to see how we can transfer some of the subsidy that is given when the flat is purchased, whether we transfer it into his CPF for retirement or medical expenses or to buy another flat...to make sure they don't take it out as cash and spend it away.'
But, he added, if the proceeds from selling the flat are used to buy another property, 'there will not be an issue'.
'We are not concerned if they are substituting one house for another, it's only when they use it for all sorts of (other) things,' he said.
Last month, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong expressed concern over the trend of people selling their flats for a quick profit with little regard for future housing.
Some of these people have turned to Members of Parliament for help. Others have turned to the HDB or to relatives, while some have set up homes on beaches, he noted.
More recently, home owners desperate for cash are reported to have pledged flats to moneylenders as collateral for loans. Mr Mah said these cases were 'cause for concern'.
'So that's why we need to step up our education efforts, to emphasise that the HDB flat is not only a roof over their heads, but also a long-term investment.
'It's not for short-term profit or speculation,' he said.
He added that this is part of HDB's 'life cycle approach to housing' - where it subsidises flats and helps young couples get on the property ladder.
The HDB also arranges upgrading and ensures that flats maintain their value, and finally helps people monetise their flat when they retire, he said.
'But this works only if people do not cash out of their flats prematurely. If they were to sell their flats halfway through and use the money for various things, whether to start a business or to pay debts or spend on luxury items, then the whole concept doesn't work any more,' he said.
The Government is worried that more people are doing that and not making other arrangements for housing, he said.
Housing analysts The Straits Times spoke to say it is premature to predict what form new policies, if any, will take to tackle this challenge.
Associate Professor Sing Tien Foo of the National University of Singapore's real estate department said some proportion of profits from the sale of HDB flats could be locked into Central Provident Fund accounts, just as the CPF Investment Scheme requires profits made from the investments to be returned.
'But in our current hot property market, where significant gains can be made, locking up such monies may not be a popular idea,' he said.
But he agrees that any such policy would ensure the safety of retirement funds for home owners.
'If home owners cannot withdraw home sale profits, their consumption of other goods will likely have to be deferred, especially if they do not plan to buy another property,' he said.
Mr Mah said the Government has not decided what actions to take, but is looking at different measures.
'We have to find a way to make sure that this message of long-term investment is emphasised,' he said.
ST : Keen bids for Alkaff Mansion
Apr 7, 2010
Keen bids for Alkaff Mansion
Food & beverage firm tops tender list with a monthly rent offer of $79,251
By Joyce Teo
A NEWLY set up food and beverage company fronted by Italian Gabriele Piegaia has topped the bids for the keenly contested former Alkaff Mansion site.
The two-month-old company, LES, topped the tender with a monthly rent offer of $79,251, which is about three times the Singapore Land Authority's (SLA) monthly guide rent of $28,100.
Fragrance Group came in second with a monthly offer of $41,300 while Bakerzin Holdings was third with $36,380.
The top three bidders declined to be interviewed.
Perched on top of Telok Blangah Hill Park, Alkaff - a majestic conserved building - has been left vacant since 2003. The SLA recently put it up for lease by tender.
Of the nine bidders, six had offered to pay a monthly rent that is above the guide rent. They included food and beverage players Villa Frangipani.com and Timbre 2.
The remaining three offered rents of only $3,009 to $23,431.
Most of the bids came from food and beverage firms, said an SLA spokesman.
LES was incorporated on Feb 1 this year.
A company search showed that it has two shareholders. One is Kenji Tanaka Salz, an American living in Doha and the other is Mr Piegaia, who is a Singapore permanent resident.
There is a well known chef in Singapore by the same name who was previously the executive chef at Senso Ristorante & Bar in Club Street and is currently an executive sous chef at Resorts World Sentosa.
But when contacted at his work place, the 32-year-old chef brushed aside any link to LES, saying: 'You are mistaken. I am just a cook.'
The former Alkaff Mansion was once a popular wedding venue.
Built in the 1920s as a family retreat by Yemeni businessman Syed Abdul Rahman Alkaff, the building was turned into a dining and entertainment hub in 1990 after a $5 million makeover.
It was popular for a decade, before the economy dipped and hit the business.
Hotel Properties, which had leased the property for 15 years, finally closed it down in 2003.
SLA had said the property, which has a gross floor area of 13,142 sq ft, can be used as a food & beverage outlet, art gallery, wellness/spa facilities or a museum.
It sits on a land area of 96,699 sq ft,
The lease term is for three years with an option to renew for another two three-year terms.
'In selecting the winning bid, SLA considers among other factors, the tendered price, concepts, proposed uses, track record and financial health of the bidders,' said the SLA spokesman.
'In the case of the former Alkaff Mansion, we aim to announce the results before end June 2010.'
Keen bids for Alkaff Mansion
Food & beverage firm tops tender list with a monthly rent offer of $79,251
By Joyce Teo
A NEWLY set up food and beverage company fronted by Italian Gabriele Piegaia has topped the bids for the keenly contested former Alkaff Mansion site.
The two-month-old company, LES, topped the tender with a monthly rent offer of $79,251, which is about three times the Singapore Land Authority's (SLA) monthly guide rent of $28,100.
Fragrance Group came in second with a monthly offer of $41,300 while Bakerzin Holdings was third with $36,380.
The top three bidders declined to be interviewed.
Perched on top of Telok Blangah Hill Park, Alkaff - a majestic conserved building - has been left vacant since 2003. The SLA recently put it up for lease by tender.
Of the nine bidders, six had offered to pay a monthly rent that is above the guide rent. They included food and beverage players Villa Frangipani.com and Timbre 2.
The remaining three offered rents of only $3,009 to $23,431.
Most of the bids came from food and beverage firms, said an SLA spokesman.
LES was incorporated on Feb 1 this year.
A company search showed that it has two shareholders. One is Kenji Tanaka Salz, an American living in Doha and the other is Mr Piegaia, who is a Singapore permanent resident.
There is a well known chef in Singapore by the same name who was previously the executive chef at Senso Ristorante & Bar in Club Street and is currently an executive sous chef at Resorts World Sentosa.
But when contacted at his work place, the 32-year-old chef brushed aside any link to LES, saying: 'You are mistaken. I am just a cook.'
The former Alkaff Mansion was once a popular wedding venue.
Built in the 1920s as a family retreat by Yemeni businessman Syed Abdul Rahman Alkaff, the building was turned into a dining and entertainment hub in 1990 after a $5 million makeover.
It was popular for a decade, before the economy dipped and hit the business.
Hotel Properties, which had leased the property for 15 years, finally closed it down in 2003.
SLA had said the property, which has a gross floor area of 13,142 sq ft, can be used as a food & beverage outlet, art gallery, wellness/spa facilities or a museum.
It sits on a land area of 96,699 sq ft,
The lease term is for three years with an option to renew for another two three-year terms.
'In selecting the winning bid, SLA considers among other factors, the tendered price, concepts, proposed uses, track record and financial health of the bidders,' said the SLA spokesman.
'In the case of the former Alkaff Mansion, we aim to announce the results before end June 2010.'
ST : Mah Bow Tan Q & A
Apr 7, 2010
Q & A
Q Some new HDB flats have been criticised for being too expensive. Is this justified?
When you look at the whole menu of flats today, compared to those in the 80s, it's totally different because times have changed. People's expectations have changed.
So it's a real challenge. Why? Because when I build those new generation flats, people go: 'Wah, HDB flats so expensive, why are you charging up to $600,000?'
I say: 'Look, those who are earning close to $8,000 want those kinds of flats (like Pinnacle@Duxton or Dawson), and they can afford it.' And they rush for it, because they know that even though they are paying that price, the flat is worth much more.
If you are earning less, at $3,000 to $5,000, HDB has got other flats for you. Such flats are the bulk of HDB's supply.
If we were just catering to the bottom 20 per cent minimum model, I don't have to do all this. I'll just build basic, standard three-room flats. That's it. Everybody will be eligible for three-room flats of standard model and size only.
Q Why has housing supply not risen quickly enough to meet rising demand?
The point is when demand shoots up, that's where we have to increase the supply. And this supply and demand mismatch is something that we've been trying to meet through HDB's BTO (build-to-order) system.
For new flats, we are able to meet the demand right now. The increase in prices is now in the resale flat market, and it's there that we have taken a hands-off approach, because we don't control the prices.
Q Some home buyers have called for the cash-over-valuation (COV) in the resale market to be removed or controlled. Is this at all possible?
If we decide we don't want to control resale price (as HDB has adopted a market system), then we can't control the COV. We just have to let it be subject to market forces...and when the market comes down, COV prices will come down. The COV is not unique to (the HDB market), it's part and parcel of a total selling price, even for private homes.
Q & A
Q Some new HDB flats have been criticised for being too expensive. Is this justified?
When you look at the whole menu of flats today, compared to those in the 80s, it's totally different because times have changed. People's expectations have changed.
So it's a real challenge. Why? Because when I build those new generation flats, people go: 'Wah, HDB flats so expensive, why are you charging up to $600,000?'
I say: 'Look, those who are earning close to $8,000 want those kinds of flats (like Pinnacle@Duxton or Dawson), and they can afford it.' And they rush for it, because they know that even though they are paying that price, the flat is worth much more.
If you are earning less, at $3,000 to $5,000, HDB has got other flats for you. Such flats are the bulk of HDB's supply.
If we were just catering to the bottom 20 per cent minimum model, I don't have to do all this. I'll just build basic, standard three-room flats. That's it. Everybody will be eligible for three-room flats of standard model and size only.
Q Why has housing supply not risen quickly enough to meet rising demand?
The point is when demand shoots up, that's where we have to increase the supply. And this supply and demand mismatch is something that we've been trying to meet through HDB's BTO (build-to-order) system.
For new flats, we are able to meet the demand right now. The increase in prices is now in the resale flat market, and it's there that we have taken a hands-off approach, because we don't control the prices.
Q Some home buyers have called for the cash-over-valuation (COV) in the resale market to be removed or controlled. Is this at all possible?
If we decide we don't want to control resale price (as HDB has adopted a market system), then we can't control the COV. We just have to let it be subject to market forces...and when the market comes down, COV prices will come down. The COV is not unique to (the HDB market), it's part and parcel of a total selling price, even for private homes.
ST : Mr Minister, a nice home with nice view now please
Apr 7, 2010
THE ST INTERVIEW
Mr Minister, a nice home with nice view now please
Unrealistic expectations are a reason for some unhappiness about flats
By Jessica Cheam
WITH prices of public housing busting records in recent months and concerns escalating over supply and affordability, the man overseeing Singapore's red-hot property market has found himself in the hot seat.
But the ever unflappable National Development Minister refuses to be unnerved by the emotionally charged debate now playing out online and in newspaper forums.
Rather, in his first full interview with The Straits Times since a year ago, Mr Mah Bow Tan gives this calm assurance: Housing prices have not moved faster than household incomes in the past decade, contrary to popular opinion.
To back it up, he whips out a chart of fresh figures collated by the Housing Board (HDB) and the Department of Statistics. It maps out the HDB resale flat price index and median household income levels over the past 10 years, with 1999 as the base year.
It shows that from 1999 to 2001, median household incomes actually outstripped resale home prices, rising 10 per cent, while home prices fell 13 per cent. From 2001 to 2006, the two inched upwards in tandem.
Both indicators rose sharply from 2006 onwards during Singapore's last property boom - until a major blip: Median household incomes fell from 2008 to 2009 because of the financial crisis, while resale flat prices continued to inch up.
'So, when people say prices have moved faster than incomes, it's not true...Realistically, in the last 10 years, prices have moved in tandem with income - except the last year. And this was an anomaly,' he says.
So how exactly did this happen?
He points to a confluence of factors.
While many disgruntled home buyers have blamed all sorts of people from the growing legions of cash-rich permanent residents (PRs) to private property owners investing in HDB flats for the rocketing prices, Mr Mah says the true picture is not so simple.
Yes, he concedes, to some extent, PRs have contributed to housing demand as a result of simple economics: There are more of them, demand increases, prices go up.
But there is also the improving economy, which means home hunters, more confident of holding their jobs, can afford to pay higher prices. Another factor: Pent-up demand from those who deferred purchases in the flattish years from 2001 to 2006.
Then there are others who may not have thought about buying but are doing so now because they are afraid prices will go up further, he says. 'So you add this group of factors, and you get this huge increase in demand, and that's why prices are going up.'
This 'anomaly', as he puts it, has not gone unnoticed by the opposition parties, which have signalled their intention to contest Mr Mah's Tampines ward by playing on the unhappiness surrounding housing issues.
To that, the 61-year-old, who has fought and won four general elections in Tampines, responds coolly: 'Whoever thinks they can do a better job, please come forward.
'The election is not about me or about any MP, but about the residents...They will have to decide who is better able to improve their lives,' he says.
But hard facts and statistics aside, what about the public angst that housing prices are spiralling out of reach?
'Every time someone like that comes to me, I say: 'Sit down'. I ask about their flats: 'What's your monthly instalment, what's your salary, why do you say it's unaffordable?'
'They tell me their father bought it years ago and it was so cheap...and compare home prices to 40 years ago,' he says with a hint of frustration.
'So many things have changed over four decades, and if you want to compare something 40 years ago and today, you can compare a lot of other things. I don't want to go there,' he says emphatically.
The reality on the ground, he says, is that every year, 12,000 flats are sold, and the average proportion of monthly income spent on mortgage repayments is about 22 per cent - a very healthy level, according to international standards.
'So I ask, what are you questioning? Am I telling lies or fudging the figures? Which part is wrong? Point it out to me,' Mr Mah says.
He attributes the sense of unhappiness among home seekers to a combination of rising expectations and how the 'Singapore dream' has evolved too quickly today.
He brings up his own HDB story, which he shared previously in Parliament: After he lost his father at the age of three, he and his mother, a domestic servant, moved from a kampung in Lorong Ah Soo first to a shophouse in High Street, then to a one-room flat in Bugis Street, and eventually to Kim Keat Avenue with his aunt.
'There, eight of us in a three-room flat shared one toilet and bathroom, while my mother stayed in a one-room rental flat in Whampoa Road,' he recounts. His family later upgraded to a four-room flat in Toa Payoh - what he calls a 'typical Singapore story of my generation'.
'Many people in my generation...started off small and modestly, worked hard, then upgraded our homes later. That's how it was...but because we progressed so fast and so far in our generation, I think people may have forgotten how we started,' he says.
Unfortunately, he notes, there are many buyers who expect the ideal flat the moment they get married, 'in an ideal location with nice views'.
'I think that's not doable. It's not realistic for us to build enough flats of so- called ideal character to satisfy everybody. So our commitment is, we will build sufficient new flats that are affordable in good locations. That may not mean in the city centre, but they are well serviced with good facilities - within a three-year timeframe,' he says.
But does he think that will be enough to satisfy a new generation of home seekers who seem to want it all now?
He says he believes Singapore's housing philosophy is for the benefit of the majority and will stand the test of time.
Over the four decades since Singapore attained self-governance, HDB has had to make some hard choices that were proved right, he maintains.
For example, HDB adopted a home ownership, instead of a rental, model. It also decided to liberalise the resale flat market, and chose to adopt a 'maximum' approach - where HDB would provide for the majority of the population, instead of just the bottom 20 per cent, as in most other cities.
'We managed to make Singaporeans feel they own a part of the country. This is important because it created a sense of nationhood,' he says.
'If you don't own a home, and rent a home, where's your sense of belonging? Would you go for national service, and what are you fighting for?'
But some detractors reason that HDB's woes today stem from it taking on too many onerous political and socio-economic roles over the years.
These range, they argue, from creating a sense of national identity, to social cohesion, to asset enhancement, to saving for retirement and encouraging marriage.
They ask: Should HDB take on fewer functions and focus on its fundamental mandate of providing affordable housing?
To that, Mr Mah says that HDB was never meant to be a 'mere developer'.
If it were, 'we'd just build a flat and sell it. That's it. But as a public housing authority, HDB not just sells the flat, but manages your flat, looks after it and eventually...it facilitates the monetisation of flats. So it's really a whole life cycle', he says.
Looking ahead to the next decade, Mr Mah acknowledges that HDB - and more broadly, the Ministry of National Development - has its work cut out for it, as Singapore is on the cusp of great demographic change.
Tricky challenges he foresees include raising the quality of housing to match expectations and maximising the nation's scarce land while trying to provide adequate spaces for residents as ever more people converge on Singapore.
He believes the Government will rise to the challenge, but he cautions against the people taking things for granted.
'I just want to remind Singaporeans it was not that long ago that we were at that situation (where people were still living in kampungs). We had to work hard for what we have. Life doesn't hand things to us on a silver platter, and I think that has not changed.'
THE ST INTERVIEW
Mr Minister, a nice home with nice view now please
Unrealistic expectations are a reason for some unhappiness about flats
By Jessica Cheam
WITH prices of public housing busting records in recent months and concerns escalating over supply and affordability, the man overseeing Singapore's red-hot property market has found himself in the hot seat.
But the ever unflappable National Development Minister refuses to be unnerved by the emotionally charged debate now playing out online and in newspaper forums.
Rather, in his first full interview with The Straits Times since a year ago, Mr Mah Bow Tan gives this calm assurance: Housing prices have not moved faster than household incomes in the past decade, contrary to popular opinion.
To back it up, he whips out a chart of fresh figures collated by the Housing Board (HDB) and the Department of Statistics. It maps out the HDB resale flat price index and median household income levels over the past 10 years, with 1999 as the base year.
It shows that from 1999 to 2001, median household incomes actually outstripped resale home prices, rising 10 per cent, while home prices fell 13 per cent. From 2001 to 2006, the two inched upwards in tandem.
Both indicators rose sharply from 2006 onwards during Singapore's last property boom - until a major blip: Median household incomes fell from 2008 to 2009 because of the financial crisis, while resale flat prices continued to inch up.
'So, when people say prices have moved faster than incomes, it's not true...Realistically, in the last 10 years, prices have moved in tandem with income - except the last year. And this was an anomaly,' he says.
So how exactly did this happen?
He points to a confluence of factors.
While many disgruntled home buyers have blamed all sorts of people from the growing legions of cash-rich permanent residents (PRs) to private property owners investing in HDB flats for the rocketing prices, Mr Mah says the true picture is not so simple.
Yes, he concedes, to some extent, PRs have contributed to housing demand as a result of simple economics: There are more of them, demand increases, prices go up.
But there is also the improving economy, which means home hunters, more confident of holding their jobs, can afford to pay higher prices. Another factor: Pent-up demand from those who deferred purchases in the flattish years from 2001 to 2006.
Then there are others who may not have thought about buying but are doing so now because they are afraid prices will go up further, he says. 'So you add this group of factors, and you get this huge increase in demand, and that's why prices are going up.'
This 'anomaly', as he puts it, has not gone unnoticed by the opposition parties, which have signalled their intention to contest Mr Mah's Tampines ward by playing on the unhappiness surrounding housing issues.
To that, the 61-year-old, who has fought and won four general elections in Tampines, responds coolly: 'Whoever thinks they can do a better job, please come forward.
'The election is not about me or about any MP, but about the residents...They will have to decide who is better able to improve their lives,' he says.
But hard facts and statistics aside, what about the public angst that housing prices are spiralling out of reach?
'Every time someone like that comes to me, I say: 'Sit down'. I ask about their flats: 'What's your monthly instalment, what's your salary, why do you say it's unaffordable?'
'They tell me their father bought it years ago and it was so cheap...and compare home prices to 40 years ago,' he says with a hint of frustration.
'So many things have changed over four decades, and if you want to compare something 40 years ago and today, you can compare a lot of other things. I don't want to go there,' he says emphatically.
The reality on the ground, he says, is that every year, 12,000 flats are sold, and the average proportion of monthly income spent on mortgage repayments is about 22 per cent - a very healthy level, according to international standards.
'So I ask, what are you questioning? Am I telling lies or fudging the figures? Which part is wrong? Point it out to me,' Mr Mah says.
He attributes the sense of unhappiness among home seekers to a combination of rising expectations and how the 'Singapore dream' has evolved too quickly today.
He brings up his own HDB story, which he shared previously in Parliament: After he lost his father at the age of three, he and his mother, a domestic servant, moved from a kampung in Lorong Ah Soo first to a shophouse in High Street, then to a one-room flat in Bugis Street, and eventually to Kim Keat Avenue with his aunt.
'There, eight of us in a three-room flat shared one toilet and bathroom, while my mother stayed in a one-room rental flat in Whampoa Road,' he recounts. His family later upgraded to a four-room flat in Toa Payoh - what he calls a 'typical Singapore story of my generation'.
'Many people in my generation...started off small and modestly, worked hard, then upgraded our homes later. That's how it was...but because we progressed so fast and so far in our generation, I think people may have forgotten how we started,' he says.
Unfortunately, he notes, there are many buyers who expect the ideal flat the moment they get married, 'in an ideal location with nice views'.
'I think that's not doable. It's not realistic for us to build enough flats of so- called ideal character to satisfy everybody. So our commitment is, we will build sufficient new flats that are affordable in good locations. That may not mean in the city centre, but they are well serviced with good facilities - within a three-year timeframe,' he says.
But does he think that will be enough to satisfy a new generation of home seekers who seem to want it all now?
He says he believes Singapore's housing philosophy is for the benefit of the majority and will stand the test of time.
Over the four decades since Singapore attained self-governance, HDB has had to make some hard choices that were proved right, he maintains.
For example, HDB adopted a home ownership, instead of a rental, model. It also decided to liberalise the resale flat market, and chose to adopt a 'maximum' approach - where HDB would provide for the majority of the population, instead of just the bottom 20 per cent, as in most other cities.
'We managed to make Singaporeans feel they own a part of the country. This is important because it created a sense of nationhood,' he says.
'If you don't own a home, and rent a home, where's your sense of belonging? Would you go for national service, and what are you fighting for?'
But some detractors reason that HDB's woes today stem from it taking on too many onerous political and socio-economic roles over the years.
These range, they argue, from creating a sense of national identity, to social cohesion, to asset enhancement, to saving for retirement and encouraging marriage.
They ask: Should HDB take on fewer functions and focus on its fundamental mandate of providing affordable housing?
To that, Mr Mah says that HDB was never meant to be a 'mere developer'.
If it were, 'we'd just build a flat and sell it. That's it. But as a public housing authority, HDB not just sells the flat, but manages your flat, looks after it and eventually...it facilitates the monetisation of flats. So it's really a whole life cycle', he says.
Looking ahead to the next decade, Mr Mah acknowledges that HDB - and more broadly, the Ministry of National Development - has its work cut out for it, as Singapore is on the cusp of great demographic change.
Tricky challenges he foresees include raising the quality of housing to match expectations and maximising the nation's scarce land while trying to provide adequate spaces for residents as ever more people converge on Singapore.
He believes the Government will rise to the challenge, but he cautions against the people taking things for granted.
'I just want to remind Singaporeans it was not that long ago that we were at that situation (where people were still living in kampungs). We had to work hard for what we have. Life doesn't hand things to us on a silver platter, and I think that has not changed.'
BT : Don't pamper spoilt property buyers
Business Times - 07 Apr 2010
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Don't pamper spoilt property buyers
I REFER to the commentary 'Public + private=property prices' (BT, April 3-4).
I would like to make two points on the writer's view that if private property prices go up, public flat prices will have to follow and hence intervention is needed.
1. Resale mass market condos are still affordable: First of all, mass market private property prices in Singapore over the past decade have hardly kept pace with even economic growth. While most countries enjoyed a property boom from the mid-1990s (post the commercial property bust in the US of 1990-1993) until the financial crisis of 2008, Singapore property prices peaked in 1996 and were in the midst of a long bear market until 2006; only in mid-2007 did the mass market condo segment start showing any signs of life. This very short rally from mid-2007 to mid-2008 was cut brutally short by the financial crisis. The property markets are now merely continuing from where they left off in mid-2008. The quarter-to-quarter comparisons that are so favoured by analysts and the media look high only because of the very low base and the fact that the market has to make up for quite a bit of lost ground over the past decade.
My point above is supported by the fact that resale condo prices are still very reasonable and not out of reach for upgraders. To illustrate, I would like to draw your attention to several good-quality condos near amenities in the Upper East Coast area such as Stratford Court, Villa Marina and Eastwood Green that are still available and have transacted recently in the $600 psf range - which means a spacious 1,200 sq ft condo can be bought for less than $800,000. Can someone explain to me how this is a bubble? In a truly overheated market (for example, London before the crisis), even resale flats receive several bids, sometimes even higher than the asking price.
The fact that new launches such as The Vision are selling at more than $1,000 psf only proves the herd-like mentality of unsophisticated buyers and not the fact that there are no affordable condos. If upgraders choose to buy at higher prices from developers, it is their problem and not one that requires government intervention. New launches cannot be used as benchmarks for the condo segment as a whole when nearby older properties are trading at a 20-30 per cent discount. There is still ample supply in the secondary market, as around half the condos bought in Singapore are for investment purposes and not for owner occupation. Ignoring this source of supply and continuing to release more land will result in an oversupplied and depressed property market similar to what we saw after the Asian crisis.
2. Buyers are too choosy and need to adjust to new realities: It has been proven several times by the government that buyers reject most flats offered to them for the flimsiest of reasons such as low floor, far from schools, etc, and then they claim that affordable property does not exist. Pandering to such 'spoilt' buyers is not the way forward. In major cities such as London, New York and Chicago, a workplace commute of around one hour is the norm; so will the case be here as prime-location property gets priced higher.
In a nutshell, every type of property - whether it has a poor view, faces the sun or is on a low floor - has its own price set by supply and demand. Buyers need to be mature and accept this fact rather than go crying to the government and asking for intervention. The government is already doing more than its share by selling subsidised built-to-order flats. Demanding cheap resale flats and condos on top of that is a bit too much.
Bobby Jayaraman
Arthur Sim replies: HDB data revealed that in Q4 2009, COV (cash-over-valuation) for resale flats was $24,000, double the $12,000 for Q3 2009. This does not represent a stable resale market. The median COV amount continued to rise in Q1 2010 - up $1,000, to $25,000.
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Don't pamper spoilt property buyers
I REFER to the commentary 'Public + private=property prices' (BT, April 3-4).
I would like to make two points on the writer's view that if private property prices go up, public flat prices will have to follow and hence intervention is needed.
1. Resale mass market condos are still affordable: First of all, mass market private property prices in Singapore over the past decade have hardly kept pace with even economic growth. While most countries enjoyed a property boom from the mid-1990s (post the commercial property bust in the US of 1990-1993) until the financial crisis of 2008, Singapore property prices peaked in 1996 and were in the midst of a long bear market until 2006; only in mid-2007 did the mass market condo segment start showing any signs of life. This very short rally from mid-2007 to mid-2008 was cut brutally short by the financial crisis. The property markets are now merely continuing from where they left off in mid-2008. The quarter-to-quarter comparisons that are so favoured by analysts and the media look high only because of the very low base and the fact that the market has to make up for quite a bit of lost ground over the past decade.
My point above is supported by the fact that resale condo prices are still very reasonable and not out of reach for upgraders. To illustrate, I would like to draw your attention to several good-quality condos near amenities in the Upper East Coast area such as Stratford Court, Villa Marina and Eastwood Green that are still available and have transacted recently in the $600 psf range - which means a spacious 1,200 sq ft condo can be bought for less than $800,000. Can someone explain to me how this is a bubble? In a truly overheated market (for example, London before the crisis), even resale flats receive several bids, sometimes even higher than the asking price.
The fact that new launches such as The Vision are selling at more than $1,000 psf only proves the herd-like mentality of unsophisticated buyers and not the fact that there are no affordable condos. If upgraders choose to buy at higher prices from developers, it is their problem and not one that requires government intervention. New launches cannot be used as benchmarks for the condo segment as a whole when nearby older properties are trading at a 20-30 per cent discount. There is still ample supply in the secondary market, as around half the condos bought in Singapore are for investment purposes and not for owner occupation. Ignoring this source of supply and continuing to release more land will result in an oversupplied and depressed property market similar to what we saw after the Asian crisis.
2. Buyers are too choosy and need to adjust to new realities: It has been proven several times by the government that buyers reject most flats offered to them for the flimsiest of reasons such as low floor, far from schools, etc, and then they claim that affordable property does not exist. Pandering to such 'spoilt' buyers is not the way forward. In major cities such as London, New York and Chicago, a workplace commute of around one hour is the norm; so will the case be here as prime-location property gets priced higher.
In a nutshell, every type of property - whether it has a poor view, faces the sun or is on a low floor - has its own price set by supply and demand. Buyers need to be mature and accept this fact rather than go crying to the government and asking for intervention. The government is already doing more than its share by selling subsidised built-to-order flats. Demanding cheap resale flats and condos on top of that is a bit too much.
Bobby Jayaraman
Arthur Sim replies: HDB data revealed that in Q4 2009, COV (cash-over-valuation) for resale flats was $24,000, double the $12,000 for Q3 2009. This does not represent a stable resale market. The median COV amount continued to rise in Q1 2010 - up $1,000, to $25,000.
BT : Value of property investment deals down 8.5% in Q1
Business Times - 07 Apr 2010
Value of property investment deals down 8.5% in Q1
AFTER three consecutive quarters of growth, the value of property investment transactions in Q1 2010 fell 8.5 per cent quarter-on-quarter to $2.64 billion.
The figures, compiled by DTZ Research, also showed that in contrast to last year when residential sales dominated the investment market, investments in the industrial segment stood out in Q1 2010.
Industrial property investments accounted for $1.02 billion or 38.5 per cent of the total value of transactions. The bulk of this was due to the sale and leaseback deals that were made by soon-to-be-listed Cache Logistics Trust with the owners of six industrial properties. These deals totalled some $713.2 million in all.
Residential investments came in second at $879.2 million. The majority of it (94 per cent) was from the sale of sites in the government land sales (GLS) programme. Private investment sales of residential property were noticeably crowded out. DTZ said that trend is likely to continue into Q2 2010 with the GLS programme expected to be the main source of land supply for residential development.
Investment by local companies continued to dominate the scene due to purchases by local developers and real estate investment trusts (Reits). However, there could be more foreign purchasers in the coming quarters, DTZ said.
Ongoing economic recovery is also expected to lead to increased investment activity in 2010.
'Besides the purchase of land for residential development, acquisitions by Reits are resuming. More office buildings are also expected to be transacted for redevelopment into residential use for owner occupation or rental yield,' said Shaun Poh, senior director for investment advisory services and auction.
DTZ's figures comprise transactions that are more than $5 million each. They exclude $1.75 billion of transactions in single residential units, or lots that cannot be redeveloped or subdivided into more than one plot, as well as deals that are deemed to be interested person party transactions.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Value of property investment deals down 8.5% in Q1
AFTER three consecutive quarters of growth, the value of property investment transactions in Q1 2010 fell 8.5 per cent quarter-on-quarter to $2.64 billion.
The figures, compiled by DTZ Research, also showed that in contrast to last year when residential sales dominated the investment market, investments in the industrial segment stood out in Q1 2010.
Industrial property investments accounted for $1.02 billion or 38.5 per cent of the total value of transactions. The bulk of this was due to the sale and leaseback deals that were made by soon-to-be-listed Cache Logistics Trust with the owners of six industrial properties. These deals totalled some $713.2 million in all.
Residential investments came in second at $879.2 million. The majority of it (94 per cent) was from the sale of sites in the government land sales (GLS) programme. Private investment sales of residential property were noticeably crowded out. DTZ said that trend is likely to continue into Q2 2010 with the GLS programme expected to be the main source of land supply for residential development.
Investment by local companies continued to dominate the scene due to purchases by local developers and real estate investment trusts (Reits). However, there could be more foreign purchasers in the coming quarters, DTZ said.
Ongoing economic recovery is also expected to lead to increased investment activity in 2010.
'Besides the purchase of land for residential development, acquisitions by Reits are resuming. More office buildings are also expected to be transacted for redevelopment into residential use for owner occupation or rental yield,' said Shaun Poh, senior director for investment advisory services and auction.
DTZ's figures comprise transactions that are more than $5 million each. They exclude $1.75 billion of transactions in single residential units, or lots that cannot be redeveloped or subdivided into more than one plot, as well as deals that are deemed to be interested person party transactions.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
BT : Alkaff Mansion draws F&B play
Business Times - 07 Apr 2010
Alkaff Mansion draws F&B play
Singapore PR Piegaia Gabriele in top bid of $79,251 per month
By KALPANA RASHIWALA
NINE parties have submitted bids in a state tender to lease the former Alkaff Mansion, with the majority proposing food & beverage use for the landmark property.
They have offered to pay monthly rentals ranging from $3,009 to $79,251 for the property at Telok Blangah Hill.
The top bidder is LES Pte Ltd. A search with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority shows that the company's shareholders are Salz Kenji Tanaka, an American whose registered address is the Four Seasons Hotel Doha in Qatar; and Piegaia Gabriele, a Singapore permanent resident.
Industry observers note that the executive sous chef of Tuscan restaurant Palio at Hotel Michael at Resorts World Sentosa is Gabriele Piegaia. When contacted by BT yesterday, however, Mr Piegaia insisted that he was not that LES shareholder.
The second-highest bidder is listed Fragrance Group, with a monthly rent offer of $41,300. Its finance director, P Aravindan, says that the group's proposal involves operating a restaurant at the site to complement its existing hotel business. Fragrance has a chain of 20 hotels around Singapore, charging room rates of about $70 to $180 per night. Its other main business is real estate.
In selecting the winning bid, SLA will consider among other factors, the tendered price, concepts, proposed uses, track record and financial health of the bidders, an SLA spokeswoman said. 'We aim to announce the results before end-June, 2010,' she added.
Other bidders include Bakerzin Holdings, Villa Frangipani.com Pte Ltd and Timbre 2 Pte Ltd.
Villa Frangipani.com - set up by Andrew Seow and Robin Greatbatch - is currently master tenant at Gillman Village Blocks 9 and 10. A related company, The Villa Bali Pte Ltd, runs Little Bali at Gillman Village comprising Villa Bali garden restaurant and bar, Warung Frangipani foodcourt, and a Chinese seafood restaurant named Bali Seafood.
Mr Greatbatch, managing director of Villa Frangipani.com, told BT yesterday that the group hoped to relocate Villa Bali to Alkaff Mansion as its master lease with SLA at Gillman Village runs out later this year and will not be renewed. The government has earmarked the Gillman Village site to be developed into an arts cluster.
Timbre 2's shareholders include Ublues Group, which runs F&B, music venues, electronic ticketing and other businesses.
Ublues operates Timbre outlets - a live music, restaurant and bar concept - at four locations including The Arts House and Substation and will soon operate three new concepts at Studio M Hotel in the Mohamed Sultan area.
'Our proposed concept for Alkaff Mansion includes F&B and an art gallery,' Ublues Group managing director Edward Chia told BT yesterday.
The remaining bidders are Sarika Connoisseur Cafe Pte Ltd, Wei Wen, Mark Ko Teong Hoon and Sofkar Sg Pte Ltd. Sofkar's activities include motion picture, video and TV programme production.
The former Alkaff Mansion, which has conservation status, can be used for the following - F&B/restaurant, art gallery, wellness/spa facilities, and museum. When the tender was launched last month, SLA had said that the guide rent is $28,100 per month and that it would issue an initial tenancy term of three years, renewable for a further two terms of three years each.
The two-storey property has been empty since former tenant Hotel Properties Ltd returned it to the Singapore Tourism Board in 2004, when its 15-year lease expired.
The property has a land area of 96,699 square feet and a gross floor area of 13,142 sq ft. An outdoor refreshment area (up to 969 sq ft) may be allowed subject to evaluation.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Alkaff Mansion draws F&B play
Singapore PR Piegaia Gabriele in top bid of $79,251 per month
By KALPANA RASHIWALA
NINE parties have submitted bids in a state tender to lease the former Alkaff Mansion, with the majority proposing food & beverage use for the landmark property.
They have offered to pay monthly rentals ranging from $3,009 to $79,251 for the property at Telok Blangah Hill.
The top bidder is LES Pte Ltd. A search with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority shows that the company's shareholders are Salz Kenji Tanaka, an American whose registered address is the Four Seasons Hotel Doha in Qatar; and Piegaia Gabriele, a Singapore permanent resident.
Industry observers note that the executive sous chef of Tuscan restaurant Palio at Hotel Michael at Resorts World Sentosa is Gabriele Piegaia. When contacted by BT yesterday, however, Mr Piegaia insisted that he was not that LES shareholder.
The second-highest bidder is listed Fragrance Group, with a monthly rent offer of $41,300. Its finance director, P Aravindan, says that the group's proposal involves operating a restaurant at the site to complement its existing hotel business. Fragrance has a chain of 20 hotels around Singapore, charging room rates of about $70 to $180 per night. Its other main business is real estate.
In selecting the winning bid, SLA will consider among other factors, the tendered price, concepts, proposed uses, track record and financial health of the bidders, an SLA spokeswoman said. 'We aim to announce the results before end-June, 2010,' she added.
Other bidders include Bakerzin Holdings, Villa Frangipani.com Pte Ltd and Timbre 2 Pte Ltd.
Villa Frangipani.com - set up by Andrew Seow and Robin Greatbatch - is currently master tenant at Gillman Village Blocks 9 and 10. A related company, The Villa Bali Pte Ltd, runs Little Bali at Gillman Village comprising Villa Bali garden restaurant and bar, Warung Frangipani foodcourt, and a Chinese seafood restaurant named Bali Seafood.
Mr Greatbatch, managing director of Villa Frangipani.com, told BT yesterday that the group hoped to relocate Villa Bali to Alkaff Mansion as its master lease with SLA at Gillman Village runs out later this year and will not be renewed. The government has earmarked the Gillman Village site to be developed into an arts cluster.
Timbre 2's shareholders include Ublues Group, which runs F&B, music venues, electronic ticketing and other businesses.
Ublues operates Timbre outlets - a live music, restaurant and bar concept - at four locations including The Arts House and Substation and will soon operate three new concepts at Studio M Hotel in the Mohamed Sultan area.
'Our proposed concept for Alkaff Mansion includes F&B and an art gallery,' Ublues Group managing director Edward Chia told BT yesterday.
The remaining bidders are Sarika Connoisseur Cafe Pte Ltd, Wei Wen, Mark Ko Teong Hoon and Sofkar Sg Pte Ltd. Sofkar's activities include motion picture, video and TV programme production.
The former Alkaff Mansion, which has conservation status, can be used for the following - F&B/restaurant, art gallery, wellness/spa facilities, and museum. When the tender was launched last month, SLA had said that the guide rent is $28,100 per month and that it would issue an initial tenancy term of three years, renewable for a further two terms of three years each.
The two-storey property has been empty since former tenant Hotel Properties Ltd returned it to the Singapore Tourism Board in 2004, when its 15-year lease expired.
The property has a land area of 96,699 square feet and a gross floor area of 13,142 sq ft. An outdoor refreshment area (up to 969 sq ft) may be allowed subject to evaluation.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
BT : OKH top bidder for Yishun industrial site with $27.2m
Business Times - 07 Apr 2010
OKH top bidder for Yishun industrial site with $27.2m
By EMILYN YAP
DEVELOPERS have bid aggressively for a 60-year leasehold industrial site at Yishun Avenue 6 (Parcel 1).
Seven parties had expressed interest by the time the tender closed yesterday. OKH Management put in a top bid of $27.2 million, or $71 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr).
The is 2.4 times the trigger price of $11.5 million, or $30 psf ppr, that an unnamed developer had committed to pay in February, prompting the Urban Redevelopment Authority to put the site up for tender.
The second-highest bid, from Soilbuild Group, is not far below the front runner. Soilbuild has offered $25.12 million, or $66 psf ppr.
In fact, five of the seven bids are above $20 million. The other three above this level are from Whye Wah Group, KNG Land and Ho Lee Group.
The bids are 'unexpectedly high' and show that developers are bullish, said Knight Frank's head of industrial business space Lim Kien Kim. 'The economy is trending upwards, and there is demand for (industrial) space.'
The Purchasing Managers' Index for March showed that the manufacturing sector expanded for an 11th straight month.
According to a CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) report yesterday, the industrial property market improved in the first quarter. Demand for factory and warehouse space is growing and rents could rise towards the end of the year, CBRE said.
The company's research executive director Li Hiaw Ho said that the high bids for Yishun Parcel 1 could be due to a lack of industrial sites in the area. 'No sites in Yishun were awarded under the government land sales programme in the past 10 years,' he said.
He projects a breakeven cost of about $250-270 psf for development on the site.
Next to Parcel 1 is Parcel 8, the tender for which is ongoing. Mr Lim expects developers bidding for Parcel 1 to bid for Parcel 8 too. A developer could reap economies of scale by getting both plots, he said.
Parcel 1 is zoned 'Business 1' and is 152,770 sq ft, with a maximum gross plot ratio of 2.5.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
__._,_.___
OKH top bidder for Yishun industrial site with $27.2m
By EMILYN YAP
DEVELOPERS have bid aggressively for a 60-year leasehold industrial site at Yishun Avenue 6 (Parcel 1).
Seven parties had expressed interest by the time the tender closed yesterday. OKH Management put in a top bid of $27.2 million, or $71 per square foot per plot ratio (psf ppr).
The is 2.4 times the trigger price of $11.5 million, or $30 psf ppr, that an unnamed developer had committed to pay in February, prompting the Urban Redevelopment Authority to put the site up for tender.
The second-highest bid, from Soilbuild Group, is not far below the front runner. Soilbuild has offered $25.12 million, or $66 psf ppr.
In fact, five of the seven bids are above $20 million. The other three above this level are from Whye Wah Group, KNG Land and Ho Lee Group.
The bids are 'unexpectedly high' and show that developers are bullish, said Knight Frank's head of industrial business space Lim Kien Kim. 'The economy is trending upwards, and there is demand for (industrial) space.'
The Purchasing Managers' Index for March showed that the manufacturing sector expanded for an 11th straight month.
According to a CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) report yesterday, the industrial property market improved in the first quarter. Demand for factory and warehouse space is growing and rents could rise towards the end of the year, CBRE said.
The company's research executive director Li Hiaw Ho said that the high bids for Yishun Parcel 1 could be due to a lack of industrial sites in the area. 'No sites in Yishun were awarded under the government land sales programme in the past 10 years,' he said.
He projects a breakeven cost of about $250-270 psf for development on the site.
Next to Parcel 1 is Parcel 8, the tender for which is ongoing. Mr Lim expects developers bidding for Parcel 1 to bid for Parcel 8 too. A developer could reap economies of scale by getting both plots, he said.
Parcel 1 is zoned 'Business 1' and is 152,770 sq ft, with a maximum gross plot ratio of 2.5.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
__._,_.___
BT : Qatar SWF snaps up top Singapore hotel
Business Times - 07 Apr 2010
Qatar SWF snaps up top Singapore hotel
US$847m tab will also give Qatari Diar 40% stake in Fairmont Raffles
By UMA SHANKARI
(SINGAPORE) Qatar's sovereign wealth fund Qatari Diar has acquired a 40 per cent stake in luxury hotel chain Fairmont Raffles in a US$847 million deal that will also see it take ownership of one of the chain's Singaporean hotels.
Fairmont Raffles declined to name the hotel that is being sold. The group owns three hotels in Singapore: Raffles Hotel, Fairmont Singapore and Swissotel The Stamford. Market watchers said that Raffles Hotel, which is more than 120 years old and gazetted as a national monument, and Swissotel have both been on the market for potential buyers over the past months.
The purchase by Qatari Diar means that Kingdom Holding, the investment company controlled by Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, has relinquished its controlling stake in Fairmont Raffles.
Toronto-based Fairmont Raffles on Monday said that it will sell new shares equivalent to 40 per cent of its capital to Cayman Islands-based Voyager Partners, a private investment company that is an affiliate of Qatari Diar. This will net the unlisted hotelier some US$467 million.
It will also earn another US$275 million from the sale of the unspecified hotel in Singapore and gain US$105 million in promised management contracts.
The proceeds will be used to fund the global expansion of Fairmont Raffles, which has about 100 hotels operating under three brands: Fairmont, Raffles and Swissotel.
The deals also aligns Fairmont Raffles with cash-rich investors in the hotel property sector amid plans to take the company public in two to three years.
Fairmont Raffles chief executive William Fatt said that all of the sale proceeds will go to Fairmont Raffles, which plans to expand with hotel projects in markets such as China and Saudi Arabia. The group is eyeing revenue growth of up to 30 per cent over the next few years.
Once the new shares are issued, Qatari Diar - which is controlled by the Qatar Investment Authority, the sovereign wealth fund which bought into the German car maker Porsche last year - will become the biggest shareholder in the hotel company.
This means that private Saudi investment firm Kingdom Holding will see its stake in the unlisted hotelier diluted to 35 per cent from 58 per cent. The company is 95 per cent owned by Prince Alwaleed, who in 2006 teamed up with US-based Colony Capital in a US$3.9 billion deal to buy Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc. The deal created Fairmont Raffles, an international luxury chain with 120 hotels in 24 countries.
Kingdom Holding will become the second-largest shareholder, followed by Colony Capital, which will own around 22 per cent.
Teaming with Qatari Diar, which owns hotels, will boost Fairmont Raffles' management business, Prince Alwaleed said in an interview with Bloomberg Television.
'They will supply us with a maximum number of hotels that will add to our income stream,' he said. 'Consequently when we go public, hopefully in the next two to three years, this will add dramatic value to us.'
Mr Fatt said that any future public offer will take place outside of Saudi Arabia. Asia is the largest area of growth for Fairmont Raffles, followed by the Middle East and Europe.
Riyadh-based Kingdom Holding is consolidating its business by selling stakes in some of its interests and taking full control of others. News Corp in February agreed to buy a 9.1 per cent stake in Prince Alwaleed's Rotana Group and Kingdom Holding on March 15 offered to purchase the rest of the shares in Kingdom Hotel Investments.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Which will it be? Fairmont Raffles is keeping mum on which of the three hotels in the chain - (from above) Swissotel The Stamford, Raffles Hotel and Fairmont Singapore - it will own
Qatar SWF snaps up top Singapore hotel
US$847m tab will also give Qatari Diar 40% stake in Fairmont Raffles
By UMA SHANKARI
(SINGAPORE) Qatar's sovereign wealth fund Qatari Diar has acquired a 40 per cent stake in luxury hotel chain Fairmont Raffles in a US$847 million deal that will also see it take ownership of one of the chain's Singaporean hotels.
Fairmont Raffles declined to name the hotel that is being sold. The group owns three hotels in Singapore: Raffles Hotel, Fairmont Singapore and Swissotel The Stamford. Market watchers said that Raffles Hotel, which is more than 120 years old and gazetted as a national monument, and Swissotel have both been on the market for potential buyers over the past months.
The purchase by Qatari Diar means that Kingdom Holding, the investment company controlled by Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, has relinquished its controlling stake in Fairmont Raffles.
Toronto-based Fairmont Raffles on Monday said that it will sell new shares equivalent to 40 per cent of its capital to Cayman Islands-based Voyager Partners, a private investment company that is an affiliate of Qatari Diar. This will net the unlisted hotelier some US$467 million.
It will also earn another US$275 million from the sale of the unspecified hotel in Singapore and gain US$105 million in promised management contracts.
The proceeds will be used to fund the global expansion of Fairmont Raffles, which has about 100 hotels operating under three brands: Fairmont, Raffles and Swissotel.
The deals also aligns Fairmont Raffles with cash-rich investors in the hotel property sector amid plans to take the company public in two to three years.
Fairmont Raffles chief executive William Fatt said that all of the sale proceeds will go to Fairmont Raffles, which plans to expand with hotel projects in markets such as China and Saudi Arabia. The group is eyeing revenue growth of up to 30 per cent over the next few years.
Once the new shares are issued, Qatari Diar - which is controlled by the Qatar Investment Authority, the sovereign wealth fund which bought into the German car maker Porsche last year - will become the biggest shareholder in the hotel company.
This means that private Saudi investment firm Kingdom Holding will see its stake in the unlisted hotelier diluted to 35 per cent from 58 per cent. The company is 95 per cent owned by Prince Alwaleed, who in 2006 teamed up with US-based Colony Capital in a US$3.9 billion deal to buy Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc. The deal created Fairmont Raffles, an international luxury chain with 120 hotels in 24 countries.
Kingdom Holding will become the second-largest shareholder, followed by Colony Capital, which will own around 22 per cent.
Teaming with Qatari Diar, which owns hotels, will boost Fairmont Raffles' management business, Prince Alwaleed said in an interview with Bloomberg Television.
'They will supply us with a maximum number of hotels that will add to our income stream,' he said. 'Consequently when we go public, hopefully in the next two to three years, this will add dramatic value to us.'
Mr Fatt said that any future public offer will take place outside of Saudi Arabia. Asia is the largest area of growth for Fairmont Raffles, followed by the Middle East and Europe.
Riyadh-based Kingdom Holding is consolidating its business by selling stakes in some of its interests and taking full control of others. News Corp in February agreed to buy a 9.1 per cent stake in Prince Alwaleed's Rotana Group and Kingdom Holding on March 15 offered to purchase the rest of the shares in Kingdom Hotel Investments.
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
Which will it be? Fairmont Raffles is keeping mum on which of the three hotels in the chain - (from above) Swissotel The Stamford, Raffles Hotel and Fairmont Singapore - it will own
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Pre-development Land Investing
In business for over 30 years, success in providing real estate investment opportunities to clients around the world is a simple, yet effective separation of roles and responsibilites. The four pillars of strength guide the land from the research and acquisition, through to the exit, including the distribution of proceeds to our clients ......
To know more how this is really work for you and your clients....
Please contact me Terence Tay @ (+65) 9387-5896 or email : terencetay.kh@gmail.com
To know more how this is really work for you and your clients....
Please contact me Terence Tay @ (+65) 9387-5896 or email : terencetay.kh@gmail.com